Princess says new photographic evidence shows the line was not guilty of failing to aid a vessel in danger.
This picture was taken by the bird watchers on deck and shows a Panga, according to Princess Cruise Line Last April three bird watchers on the deck of Star Princess sighted a small boat at sea. As they watched it with their high quality zoom lenses they came to believe they saw one of the passengers trying to signal the ship by flagging a piece of light-colored cloth. They became concerned that the boat was adrift at sea and that the men onboard were trying to signal that they were in danger.
The three people notified some staff members who relayed the information to the bridge, but when the officers on the bridge investigated the boat they decided it was not trying to signal the ship; that it appeared to be a boat under control minding its own business. So the officers on the ship took no action.
A few days after the cruise the same three birders heard about a rescue at sea. The man who was rescued said he had been adrift in the an area close to where the birders believed they had sighted the boat. They came to the conclusion that it was the same boat and notified the media and legal authorities. As a result no less than six lawsuits were eventually filed by different entities for various reasons to make Princess "pay" for their alleged malfeasance in not coming to the rescue f a vessel in distress.
But Princess has just released recently discovered video evidence that it says shows the rescue at sea was not of the same boat as photographed by the birders aboard the Star Princess. The boat that was rescued was named "50-Cent" and had its name largely emblazoned on the bow - it was uncluttered boat with a flat bow.
Meanwhile, the pictures of the boat taken by the birders shows a completely different style of boat - with a large raised bow, no red letters and no visible double stripes (possibly one thin one). Still, the fact that it is a completely different style of boat, with a raised and covered aft section appears indisputable. A photographic expert hired by Princess was able to identify the boat photographed by the birders as a "Panga" - a typical fishing boat used in the Central America region where the ship was sailing. Here is the picture taken by the birders.
Here is a composite picture of the boat that was rescued as seen in the video below.
And here is a close up of the name "50 Cent" as painted on the bow of the rescued boat taken from the video.
The video is here:
According to Princess these picture are conclusive that the boat that was rescued was not the same boat as the birders onboard Star Princess sighted and photographed with their cameras - which also means there is no evidence that the boat they saw was in trouble. Therefore it would follow that any allegations of Princess intentionally ignoring a vessel in distress are non-corroborated and without merit. A boat was rescued at sea - but there is no evidence that Star Princess was ever in its vicinity.
Princess further maintains that the drift path of the rescued boat has nothing in common with the path taken by the cruise ship during the days it was in the area. After enduring media attacks and six lawsuits, Princess is now asking for the lawsuits to be dropped and will consider the case closed. It will not seek any damages from the people who the lines says made the inaccurate allegations.
What do you think of the evidence? Tell us here: Princess Forum
Here is the full release as given by Princess today: Princess Cruises recently discovered video footage of a rescue at sea of a small boat adrift for nearly a month in the Pacific Ocean that conclusively confirms the adrift boat, the Fifty Cent, was not the small boat spotted and photographed by three Princess passengers several weeks earlier.
The story, which broke last April, received extensive press coverage with Princess and the ship's captain widely criticized for not coming to the rescue of the men onboard, two of whom subsequently died.
Princess has been sued six times by the survivor and relatives of fishermen on the adrift boat. The lawsuits claim the cruise ship Star Princess passed within several miles of the Fifty Cent, but failed to rescue them despite three cruise ship passengers spotting them and reporting they saw a boat that might be in distress. The ship's bridge staff did not see signs of distress and therefore did not stop or notify the ship's captain.
The Princess passengers, a group of bird watchers with sophisticated telescopic camera equipment, photographed the small boat they had spotted. Their photos depict a small white boat similar to Panga boats used by local fishermen in Central America. In contrast, the video footage of the Fifty Cent's rescue shows a markedly different boat.
Princess had the newly discovered video and the original bird watchers' photos analyzed by Michael Snyder, a retired photo analyst and photogrammetry expert from NASA's Johnson Space Center. Mr. Snyder concluded that "the small boat photographed by the passengers onboard Star Princess is clearly not the small boat called Fifty Cent that Adrian Vasquez was found adrift on.
Princess began searching for photographs or video of the Fifty Cent after hearing recorded statements by plaintiff Adrian Vasquez that were inconsistent with his allegation that Star Princess had passed him by, and which were also inconsistent with the bird watchers' reported sighting. The captain of the fishing boat that rescued Vasquez has provided a sworn statement confirming that Vasquez gave a detailed account of his ordeal at the time he was rescued, but never mentioned any cruise ship passing him by.
Further supporting the fact that Star Princess did not cross paths with the Fifty Cent is a drift analysis which charted the movement of the two vessels taking into account ocean current, wind and wave data. Conducted by Weather Routing, Inc., a private meteorological consulting firm, the analysis concluded "that it is not likely the boat sighted by the guest passengers was the same boat rescued on March 23rd and identified as the Fifty Cent.
"While this remains a tragic story, we are gratified to have scientific confirmation that Star Princess was never in the vicinity of the adrift boat and that the boat photographed by our passengers was not the adrift Fifty Cent," said Alan Buckelew, president and CEO of Princess Cruises. "Nevertheless, we have used this as a valuable learning opportunity and have strengthened our bridge reporting procedures to ensure that all messages of concern from passengers or crew are carefully evaluated by our senior bridge officers."
According to Princess, the ship's captain, Edward Perrin, had been devastated by allegations his ship might have ignored a vessel in distress. Ironically, Captain Perrin was praised last month by Canadian authorities after his ship diverted to act as a wind block assisting Canadian authorities in a dramatic helicopter rescue of two sailors from a boat that was floundering in stormy conditions off the coast of British Columbia. Princess ships have come to the aid of persons or ships in distress more than 30 times in the past decade and it is fairly common for Princess ships to divert to render aid when they receive distress calls.
Princess Cruises has demanded the lawsuits be immediately dismissed and has offered to waive its right to seek recovery of legal costs,citing sympathy for the victims of the Fifty Cent's ordeal.
Video footage of Adrian Vasquez aboard the fishing boat that rescued him, and his boat Fifty Cent can be found hereA graphic comparing the Fifty Cent and the boat photographed by Princess passengers can be found here:
What do you think of the evidence? Tell us here: Princess Forum